Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Triumph introduced the first Sprint ST in 1999. The original started out as a 955cc inline triple, but was redesigned in 2005 to feature a 1050cc engine and more modern features. Since then, not that many major changes have happened to the design, with only small tweaks for each new edition. Clearly, Triumph has decided that they've gotten what they could from the ST, which is being superceded in 2011 by the Sprint GT.
 

But is it still worthwhile to look into the ST as a possible buy? There might be some second-hand STs hitting the market, especially since quite a few Triumph fans will be snapping up the new GT. The sports touring section is a very competitive one right now, so any buyer should do his research to be sure he gets the most bang for his buck.
 

The focus of the ST and GT seems to be the same niche as that targeted by the BMW K1300 series and the Honda VFR1200. The engine produces 123bhp at 9100 rpm and 76ft.lbs at 7500 rpm. This does not compare to the BMW K1300GT (or 1300S), so clearly this is not aimed at the tourer who wants the most grunt out of his engine. Yet power is certainly not everything when it comes to motorcycle touring, which is why I've spent many happy years on boxer engines. So, whilst the ST does not have the most, it certainly has enough. By all accounts though, the engine is excellent and sounds pleasantly different from the Japanese manufacturers'.
 

What should never be overlooked on a bike like this is the stopping power. I would opt for the ABS (for an extra $800), which does not come standard. When you're fully loaded and riding two-up, I just feel safer with that technology on my bike. That being said, one must never become overly reliant on braking technology and take chances...Rather learn to brake well without ABS than just assume the bike will take care of itself.

Should a Triumph rider upgrade from a previous Sprint, if they have the means? The consensus seems to be that it is worth it. The engine might not be brand new, but the gearbox has been substantially improved, as has the suspension. (It seems that both BMW and Triumph are learning to take the "clunk" out of changing gears.)
 

Where Triumph trumps the BMW 1300 is in the price range. The 2010 ST with ABS goes for around $12,799, whereas the 1300GT retails for $19,150 (plus extras). Since the Triumph seems to be a good-looking, reliable, fun yet comfortable touring machine with plenty of torque, I find it hard to argue with the price. I do not think that, in the end, the Triumph Sprint ST is in direct competition with the BMW 1300s - they seem to address different aspects of the touring experience.